• ilan levy, 2021 •
  • Home
  • Encyclopedia of Non-Sense
    • Submissions
    • FAQ
  • Campaigns 2015-19
    • 2019 Campaign
    • 2017 Campaign
    • 2015 Campaign
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Encyclopedia of Non-Sense
    • Submissions
    • FAQ
  • Campaigns 2015-19
    • 2019 Campaign
    • 2017 Campaign
    • 2015 Campaign
  • Contact

Together Rebuilding Democracy

My Democracy Pledge

***** Direct Election of Mayor *****
​1*. Select as Mayor the Candidate with the first highest #1 vote count.
2
*. Select as Vice Mayor the Candidate with the second highest #1 vote count.

***** Term Limits *****
3. Serve no longer than 3 terms of 2 years, or a cumulative 6 years as City Councilor.
​
***** Publicly Financed Campaigns *****
4. Spend no more than 15,000 dollars during my campaign, and donate any excess to the charity of my choice.​

***** People Power for Equity and Justice *****
5*. Place people and environment before money.

6. Demand accountability and transparency of elected officials, the City administration and its processes.

7. Work to reinvent our local Democracy to better serve the needs and ambitions of the citizens of Cambridge. 
​
Picture

VOTE  Nov 5, 2019

Interview with Alexandra Duprey, Graduate Student in Urban design and Evnironmental Policies.

10/27/2019

0 Comments

 
Alexandra is a graduate student with Tufts University's Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning program.   Here is how she introduced the interview to me

"""
  I'm looking into the different dimensions of the substations proposed in Cambridge and Chelsea as part of a project for an urban planning course, and I wanted to see if I would be able to interview you as part of my research.
“""

I ask Alexandra for the interview so I  could post it as she  was able to extract the essence of my campaign and what we are trying to achieve.

Here is a link to the  an interview with Wendy Brown author of  "Undoing of the Demos" , a fundamental book.    And often mention in the  interview

https://youtu.be/CAgfxJ84jQs

Thanks Alexandra it was a lot of fun.
0 Comments

Liberty without accountability leads to Authoritarianism

10/25/2019

0 Comments

 
Accountability is a fundamental element of a functioning Democracy.   Liberty, equality, accountability.  Liberty without equality is nothing more than privilege. Free speech without accountability leads to impunity.  Authoritarianism begins when the powerful think they can act with impunity.  Loose accountability, and you loose Democracy.   Anyone can say anything. There will be very little to no consequences.  With no accountability, how can we ensure equity and justice?   Cambridge has no mechanism to hold neither the City nor the politician and supporting city-wide organizations accountable.  No independent printed newspaper or journalists.  No checks and no balance.  We have lost our way.

Adapted from Billy Bragg , "Three Dimensions of Freedom"
0 Comments

Density without infrastructure, the Neversource saga.

10/20/2019

0 Comments

 
This is a copy of the a letter from  the East Cambridge Planning Team and the Linden Park Neighborhood Association.  
Show your support, sign the petition :    CLICK HERE

We Must Act to Stop the Eversource High Voltage Substation
Across from the Kennedy-Longfellow School

Earlier this year, residents in the East Cambridge and Linden Park neighborhoods were shocked to learn that Eversource intended to build a high voltage electrical substation across from the Kennedy-Longfellow elementary school (where 58% of the students are from low-income families) on Fulkerson Street and near a park and two neighborhoods:
Eversource Substation Location
Picture
A substation, among other things, transforms high voltage electricity from power generators to low voltage electricity then transmitted to homes, businesses, and other users. This station—a potential monster of a structure—is entirely inappropriate. Eversource must find an alternative solution.

1.   Background on the substation and its location

The land for the station originally belonged to Cabot, Cabot, and Forbes, who had intended to build housing on the site. Eversource purchased the property in early 2017 using a shell company as the listed buyer on the deed. Curiously, Cabot continued to seek permits for the housing for months after the purchase.
Based on a review of public filings and statements made at Council hearings, Eversource claims it has known about the need for a station since at least 2013. So why it waited until 2019 to disclose this station publicly is a mystery.

2. This is an environmental justice issue.
In the past ten years, the City has permitted millions of square feet of extra density, principally to commercial buildings and lab space. Commercial real estate developers and MIT took full advantage of the bonanza and have reaped billions in profits and increased property values. Eversource claims that the primary reason for this station is to serve 100 megawatts of expected new demand from this development—a far cry from the net-zero goals supposedly championed by the City. Like many others, we support reasonable development in Kendall Square and recognize the benefit to our neighborhoods. However, that development has also come with a hidden cost, as the buildings now need a mega electrical substation to power them. As one City Councilor put it at a hearing, it is “immoral” to let the commercial developers and MIT receive the benefit, while the nearby residents and children of Kennedy-Longfellow bear the costs. It’s just wrong.
​

3. Significant health and safety concerns

Electric stations emit electromagnetic radiation. While Eversource insists that there are no adverse health effects from this radiation, the science is in dispute, and we are aware of no study testing the long-term effects on children from prolonged exposure (though “children are regarded as being more vulnerable to the effects of environmental exposures, including electromagnetic fields”). 
What is undisputed is that substations sometimes cause explosions. Moreover, when there is an explosion, it can be significant. For example, a fire at a New York City substation in December 2018 caused this “electrical arc flash.”:
Electrical Arc Flash from NYC December 2018 Substation Fire
Picture

Similar events occurred in 2011 in Fort Worth, Texas, and again in New York City in 2012 during Hurricane Sandy.

4. The substation could tower over the residences and school
Eversource has thus far declined to disclose the height. It has said that other stations in urban areas range between 80-100 feet, and Eversource claims that this station could be twice as big. (Notably, none of these other stations is in a residential neighborhood located next to a school). These comments and information from other sources indicate that this station could be 150 feet tall.
​

5. The substation could tower over the residences and school
Eversource has given scant detail on the size or appearance of the building but provided this image at a hearing in May:
Picture
Eversource has thus far declined to disclose the height. It has said that other stations in urban areas range between 80-100 feet, and Eversource claims that this station could be twice as big. (Notably, none of these other stations is in a residential neighborhood located next to a school). These comments and information from other sources indicate that this station could be 150 feet tall:
Renderings of Possible Substation Size:
View from Kennedy-Longfellow
View Towards Kendall Square​​

6. We must act now to have any chance at a better solution
The substation is now at a critical moment. In response to opposition from residents, the City Manager’s Office, and the Council, Eversource has agreed to consider—but not commit to—alternate sites. It has self-imposed a deadline of this fall to find a new location, or it will forge ahead with its station at Fulkerson. We must work together now if we are to avoid this calamity.
​
Until Eversource finds a suitable alternative, we will never give up this fight—for our neighbors, our children, and our City. We hope you will stand with us.

This is a copy of the a letter from  the East Cambridge Planning Team and the Linden Park Neighborhood Association.  
Show your support, sign the petition :    CLICK HERE
0 Comments

A little bit about me and my campaign.

10/19/2019

0 Comments

 
I am passionate & persistent. I am the only candidate working to   
Take back your right to vote

  • for a strong Mayor and to reduce the City Manager’s vast authority 
  • members on and off the Planning Board

My Record

  • 16 years living in Cambridge
  • 13 years a community activist
  • 2007-2011 board member of East Cambridge
  • community group
  • 2009-2011 fought Alexandria over-development
  • 2013-2017 helped keep Foundry building for us 2013-2015 fought over-development of the
  • East Cambridge courthouse
  • 2013 arrested protesting killings of black men 2015 became US citizen
  • 2015 my city council “protest campaign”: to take back our right to vote for those who really run our city
  • 2016-18 Volpe, fought for Graduate Student Housing, density reduction, benefits.
  • 2017 my 2nd city council bring democracy back to Cambridge, from Plan E to Democracy
  • 2018-19 First Street Municipal Garage, fight to keep Public land in public hands.
  • 2017-18 fought DIVCO and City administration on Gore St sewer constructions for Cambridge Crossing.
  • 2018-19 fighting Eversource Fulkerson and Putnam ave substation construction and expansions.
Professional Qualifications
Boston University (electrical engineering), Cofounder, CTO, or engineer at six start-ups.

Let us put matter into context
Cambridge is not a democracy. With our “strong City Manager, weak city council” government, you are not allowed to vote for those who really run our city, the un-elected City Manager and the un- elected Planning Board. Every member of every significant Board or Commission is appointed by the City Manager. Every board relies on and is guided by city staff whose job depends on the City Manager.
You can vote for city councillors. Councillors can be elected with less than 1,000 “#1 votes” out of nearly 70,000 registered voters. Like our president, Councillors rely on their small, dedicated voter base. Our councillors represent their base of voters and donors.
The council votes one of themselves as Mayor, a “ribbon-cutter” with no meaningful power but with a bigger paycheck and many percs. The council votes “Policy Orders” which may or may not be ignored by the City Manager. The council always approves the Manager’s budget and has never fired a City Manager.
Not being elected, the City Manager & the Planning Board always approve every mega-development increasing the tax base but with:
  • more traffic & less parking
  • more long-time residents & families forced out
  • more bad deals with developers
Your city councillors can restore control to the voters anytime. The council can:
  • Create a strong Mayor
  • Allow you to vote for Mayor
  • Enforce term limits
  • Limit campaigns to public financing
  • Ban holding more than one public office ​
0 Comments

    Author

    Ilan Levy 
    #1 Cambridge City Council

    Archives

    November 2019
    October 2019

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.